Mindblog 5

I think nations are neat, but wouldn’t it be better if your family (an anti-authoritarian one ideally) were the center of your life?

Instead of only royal and bourgois famililies ruling the world, we could have a democratic united earth where all our families engage in politics together. Giving us identity through our own struggle?

Wouldn’t a family centered motivational matrix be a better way to have identity?

Family as my nation, not some state-centered nation. My family has been messed up by war, but I would not be alive without their support. The state belongs in the dustbin of history as well as well as grand nations as our primary identity, it’s unevolved.

I know there are those that do not have family because of war and economic cruelty, but you are welcome in mine if you read this, as small and messed up as ours is due to world wars. Just don’t mob me please, we are kinda small as stated.

Dr. Hawking was right, the human element needs to be maintained in civilizational function. Bots for doing work is fine as long as they don’t kill but in terms of running the civilization, bots and potential A.I. are a trashy way to deal with the running of humanity.

Wouldn’t have made it so far in improving myself without Mimi.

This blog does not consist of decrees, if you want more info on a post please debate me, I am flexible if proven wrong, also some of the stuff from days gone by in terms of my post content is no longer current within my psychological makeup.

Regarding the entire body of my artistic ourburst on the internet.

It was perhaps hotheaded, whether it was a poor decision or not remains to be seen.

I’m sorry, I was VERY lonely.

When I commenced classes after starting my path towards an undergraduate degree in political science at the university of calgary I was informed by an instructor during commencement that poltical science is the study of power relationships. Though useful, I feel that cold fact is the reason people get alienated from science when not a part of its establishment.

Science is supposed to serve humanity. Then I argue that anything worthy of the name of “poltical science” should be the study of how to help humanity through the inclusion of everyone in poltical debate. There are now so many tactics for excluding people from our so called “democracy”, such as voter supression, the corrupt prison system, or even calling people mentally ill. It is obviously communist to have everyone a part of the democratic process instead of relegating power to a bunch of wealthy persons.

For a poltical science that enables all to be a part of humanity in a meaningful way!

I am gonna try and refuse to discuss the news, once you see lies, censorship, and mutiple narratives I feel like I am not qualified to make any real analysis. I don’t know who to trust anymore. Too many power hungry people with an interest in selling arms is all I have been taught.

You filthied the Runes.

I mean we got some super awesome tech when resource wars were real and not artifical, it probably added more to our war obsession at a volatile time in our development.

Not sure this is original, but thought I’d share this thought.

My advice is realize this and overcome warmongering.